The 10 Most Signifi...
 
Notifications
Clear all
The 10 Most Significant Differences Between The Fujifilm X And The Canon EOS R
The 10 Most Significant Differences Between The Fujifilm X And The Canon EOS R
Group: Registered
Joined: 2021-12-18
New Member

About Me

The evaluations were done in comparison to other cameras of the same technical generation that were comparable in design. Also, please keep in mind that several of the websites on this list have evolved their review methodologies as well as their reporting style over time. The table below gives a synthesis of the camera evaluations provided by some of the most well-known photo-gear review sites on the internet (amateurphotographer , cameralabs , digitalcameraworld , dpreview , ephotozine , photographyblog ). Both the X-T1 and the X-T2 use SDXC cards to store their image data, which is similar to the way that the X-T1 does.

 

 

The X-WiFi T1's button is likewise tucked down between the Exposure Compensation and Shutter Speed dials, making it difficult to reach while using the camera. Interested in having more precise control over where your focus point is located inside a frame? When you push the Focus Stick in, the UI on the LCD and EVF gets a little congested since there are so many points to pick from, but if you only alter the point by moving the Stick in a direction, the UI remains quite clear. There is very little visual input, enabling you to view as much as possible both within and beyond your frame of reference.

 

 

Again, contrary to what the histogram indicates, the red channel looks to have been blown, resulting in the loss of some information. The X-T1 doesn't hold onto detail quite as well as the X-Pro1, but it does seem to be a touch sharper overall. To see what I'm talking about, move the slider on the left side of the bird back and forth many times. Even though both of these photos have been severely downscaled from their original sizes without any output sharpening, it is interesting to see that the X-Pro2 appears to be providing greater detail in both cases.

 

 

Perhaps this will change when an X-T body with a Focus Stick and a sensor with a high concentration of phase detection is introduced. In the penultimate phrase of my Introduction, I alluded to the conclusion I was coming to. How you choose to handle these cameras, or at the very least how attached you are to your handling choices, will be determined by a combination of factors.

 

 

A wide range of ISO values, including the extended ISO values, are accessible as RAW files. A metal, weatherproofed body with significantly better grip than its predecessor, the Fuji X-T2 is similar in design to the Fuji X-T1 but with a little more aggressive grip. The shutter speed and ISO dials on the camera's top plate have been raised in height, and a lock button has been added to prevent accidental changes. Despite the fact that the two cameras under consideration have the same sensor size, the X-T2 has a better resolution of 24 megapixels, compared to the X-16 T1's megapixels. It is possible to increase linear resolution by 23 percent as a result of the higher megapixel count.

 

 

Unfortunately, certain options, such as formatting memory cards, are not available for inclusion in My Menu. When shooting in low light, the refresh rate is 60 frames per second for both cameras, and the speed stays constant, however there is a rise in noise that is more noticeable on the X-T1. On the X-T2, you also have the option of increasing the refresh rate to 100 frames per second in Boost mode (which can be accessed in the Setup Menu / Power Management / Performance). Another key consideration is whether or not picture stabilization is available. Because none of these bodies are equipped with sensor-based image stabilization, you will need to purchase lenses that provide optical stabilization.

 

 

Despite the fact that the X-T1 and X-Pro1 are from different processing generations, the fundamental technology is almost identical. Finally, although tethered shooting is supported by the X-T1, it is not yet supported by the X-Pro2. The rangefinder approach may also be beneficial for folks who are ocularly dominant in the right eye and like to shoot with their left eye open in order to further scan the environment. The tripod mount of the X-T1 is off-center and seam-free, unlike the one on the X-Pro1, but it isn't nearly as beautiful as the one piece of seamless magnesium alloy on the bottom of the X-Pro2. I do a little videography at weddings, and the footage from the XT2 is just stunning.

 

 

On the accessories front, the X-T1 comes with an additional eye cup, the "EC-XT Long Eyecup," which may be purchased separately. I tried one of my friend's and ended up purchasing one for myself soon after. It truly does assist to block out stray light while you're working on your composition. Face and eye detection are available on both of these cameras, although as I indicated in my review, the X-Pro2 may have the advantage in terms of how much light it need in order to recognize a face. In fact, I believe that the increased accuracy provided by so many AF points would be more beneficial to the X-T1 kind of camera. With a tilt screen and the XF 80mm F/2.8 Macro WR OIS, I can see myself enjoying them much more when I want to truly concentrate in on the ideal point of focus or precision focusing during landscapes and long exposures.

 

 

So, if your computer gear is nearing the end of its useful life, keep this in mind before making the decision to upgrade. Both cameras are equipped with Fujifilm's film simulation modes, which are also known as image profiles in other languages. For Fujifilm, the assortment of films offered is inspired by the many rolls of film that the firm used to manufacture in the past. There are the same film simulations available on both cameras: Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, Pro Neg Standard, and Pro Neg High, among others. Take note that these profiles are for JPG images captured in-camera, but certain software packages like as Lightroom have film simulation settings that allow you to simply apply the same colors to RAW images.

 

 

Because of the higher amount of pixels, the X-T2 provides you the option of selecting a lower file size, which is ideal if you anticipate bringing home a big number of photographs. Even when you push your post-processing to the extreme, the difference between the two solutions is hardly discernible in most cases (e.g. recovering 5 stops in low light). It's fascinating to observe that the X-T1 has less noise than the X-T2, which is surprising considering the lower megapixel count. Photography using the optical viewfinder of the Fujifilm X-Pro and X100 series of cameras may provide the photographer with a great deal of creative freedom in how they construct their photographs.

 

 

I will not make assumptions about whether or not a camera purchase is "worth it." That's none of my business, or any other reviewer's for that matter, but the X-T2 is the latest and greatest thing to come out of Fuji, and it features the finest Fuji has to offer in the X series. Improved frame rates of 11 frames per second, quicker shooting intervals, reduced shutter lag and less blackout are all features that are exclusive to the VPB-XT2.

 

 

In order to photograph an accelerating or decelerating subject, or a topic that may emerge out of nowhere, it is necessary to inform the camera what you are photographing. This is without a doubt one of the most sophisticated autofocus functions that has been seen on a mirrorless camera up to this point. It is possible that the ability of a camera to interact with its surroundings will be an essential consideration in the camera selection process for some imaging applications.

Location

Occupation

X-T2, you also
Social Networks
Member Activity
0
Forum Posts
0
Topics
0
Questions
0
Answers
0
Question Comments
0
Liked
0
Received Likes
0/10
Rating
0
Blog Posts
0
Blog Comments
Share: